Buster Olney broke the news this morning in his ESPN Blog via Peter Gammons:
…the Twins want this three-player package from the Yankees, in any Santana conversation: pitcher Phil Hughes and center fielders Melky Cabrera and Austin Jackson. Given that the Yankees will probably be asked to pay Santana a deal of at least six years and $150 million to convince him to stay, I’d be shocked if they seriously considered that trade. Because part of the equation for the Yankees or any other team, as they make decisions about a possible Santana deal, is this: Even beyond the question of swapping promising young players like Hughes and Cabrera and Jackson, how much money does it save them to have cheap players on their roster. How much will it cost them to replace a Cabrera or Jackson? Without Cabrera or Jackson, the Yankees might have to sign a veteran center fielder in their place in a year or two.
And it’s possible that within three or four years, as Santana gets older and Hughes progresses, that Hughes might become something close to what Santana will be then.
I wrote late last night that the deal would probably take Hughes, Cabrera, Horne and Tabata. It looks like I was giving up too much in the deal including both Horne and Tabata, but from the various reports that I read, it was going to take a major leaguer and three “premium prospects”.
It’s not surprising that they have there eye on Austin Jackson either. He played extremely well in the Hawaiian Winter League batting .271 with 3 homers, 22 RBI’s and 8 steals. Melky Cabrera could immediately fill the Twins center-field vacancy and Hughes would be the blue-chip prospect you could build your staff around.
Olney eludes to the fact that the Yankees, or any team involved in a deal for Santana, should weigh the option of paying upwards of $150 million dollars for Santana or settle for “cheap players”. I share this concern, but not as it relates to the Yankees. Even though Cashman wants to reduce payroll, management has given no indication that they are willing to cut spending, nor do they need to. They’re the Yankees.
Trading a player like Hughes, however, is risky. Olney points out that four or five years down the road, Hughes might just become “something close to what Santana will be then”. In other words, the Yankees will find themselves in the same position they were just a few seasons earlier - looking to trade for the next big-name pitcher.
Make no mistake, the organization wants a number one guy now to compete with Boston’s ace Josh Beckett. Beckett turned out to be the real difference maker in ‘07 after a disappointing 2006 debut with the Red Sox.
As hesitant as I am to give up Hughes, a front-line number one starting pitcher is very appealing.