Its simple folks: lack of a dominant, strikeout pitcher.
There’s a great article over at Baseball Analysts that compares K/100 pitches with K/9 IP. The argument is that a higher strikeout total in relation to a lower pitch count (K/100 pitches) is a better “recipe for success” than how many strikeouts a pitcher racks up over 9 innings, or K/9 IP.
Decide for yourself, based on the data provided, whether the argument holds up.
What I find extremely bothersome, as a Yankee fan, is that we don’t have a pitcher that ranks in the top 50 of either of those categories.
The only two players ranked in the Top 80, mind you, are Andy Pettitte and Chien-Ming Wang.
- Pettitte: 215.3 IP | 141 SO | 3395 Pitches | 4.15 K/100 | 5.89 K/9 | K/9 Rank - 53
- Wang: 199.3 IP | 104 SO | 2861 Pitches | 3.64 K/100 | 4.70 K/9 | K/9 Rank - 79
The Red Sox, on the other hand, have two guys ranked in the top 10, Daisuke Matsuzaka and Josh Beckett.
- Matsuzaka: 204.7 IP | 201 SO | 3480 Pitches | 5.78 K/100 | 8.84 K/9 | K/9 Rank - 8
- Beckett: 200.7 IP | 194 SO | 3100 Pitches | 6.26 K/100 | 8.70 K/9 | K/9 Rank - 9
Here are the top 5 pitchers of K/9 IP for 2007:
- Erik Bedard: 10.33 K/9 IP
- Scott Kazmir: 10.41 K/9 IP
- Jake Peavy: 9.67 K/9 IP
- Johan Santana: 9.66 K/9 IP
- A.J. Burnett: 9.56 K/9 IP
Athletics pitcher Dan Haren, whom the Yankees have had internal discussions about, ranks #20 with 5.28 K/9 IP.
What about Joba Chamberlain? As of now, he’s the only true power pitcher slated to begin the season in the starting rotation for the Yankees. In 24 innings of relief in ‘07, he struck out 34 batters. If he pitches, say 160 innings next year, can we expect 170 strikeouts? That would be 9.56 K/9 IP and place him in the top five.
Now imagine if the Yankees landed Santana. That would mean two, lights-out power pitchers with the ability to average just over a strikeout per inning.
In my opinion, this is what the Yankee pitching staff seriously lacks.
Imagine a Santana/Chamberlain 1-2 punch? It could be dominate.
Here’s a look at the Yankee pitchers have ranked in the top 20 of K/9 IP since 2000 with a minimum of 160 IP:
2000:
2001:
- 5. Roger Clemens - 220.3 IP | 213 SO | 8.70 K/9 IP
- 8. Mike Mussina - 228.7 IP | 214 SO | 8.42 K/9 IP
- Link to full list
2002:
- 4. Roger Clemens - 180.0 IP | 192 SO | 9.60 K/9 IP
- 14. Mike Mussina - 215.7 IP | 182 SO | 7.60 K/9 IP
- Link to full list
2003:
- 9. Mike Mussina - 214.7 IP | 195 SO | 8.18 K/9 IP
- 10. Roger Clemens - 211.7 IP | 190 SO | 8.08 K/9 IP
- 15. Andy Pettitte - 208.3 IP | 180 SO | 7.78 K/9 IP
- Link to full list
2004:
- 15. Jose Contreras - 170.3 IP (95.7 w/ Yankees, 74.7 w/ White Sox) | 150 SO (82 w/ Yankees, 68 w/ White Sox) | 7.93 K/9 IP
- Note: Contreras was traded by the New York Yankees with cash to the Chicago White Sox for Esteban Loaiza. Ouch!
- Link to full list
2005:
2006:
2007:
- No player ranked in the top 50. Pettitte ranked 53rd and Wang ranked 79th.
- Link to full list
When you look at it from this perspective, and granted, it’s only one angle, the Yankees have lacked a one-two power punch since 2003 (Clemens and Mussina).
Does any of this matter? I would much rather go into the playoffs with power pitchers than finesse guys. What are your thoughts?